This blog is NOFOLLOW Free!
Conversational Marketing, Technology, Social Media, Social Networks, Blogging, SEO, SEM / Search Enging Marketing, Making Money, and Ghost Hunting (I know Random, huh?)

06Aug Why I’m leaving Twitter…Follow me on Plurk!

Twitter’s death is imminent.

Twitter has been great to me. I’ve met many wonderful people. Build wonderful relationships. But Twitter is now dead to me…

Apparently Twitter’s new spam measures are blocking a number of users from following other Twitterers. Being able to follow others on twitter is what the service is about. The brilliance behind twitter is you can block/unfollow anyone that you don’t want to listen to. So my question: Why have spam rules?

I’m not saying I’m a spammer - far from it - but I’ve been blocked for no good reason, except that my follower to followee ratio is not the way they want. In other words my growth and reach on Twitter is now dead.

I still plan on posting all my blog posts to twitter, and following up on conversations via friendfeed. But it really saddens me that Twitter is doing this crap. I’d advise everyone to jump ship and find a better network, I think Plurk may be that better network, which is why I’m inviting you all to follow me on Plurk.

Other places to follow me besides Twitter:

UPDATE: Here is a link to the Twitter faq page about the new limits in place. Also Note ALL the info following this paragraph is an update to this post - so check it out!

Here is what twitter says about these:

What are the limits?
We’re starting with a few limits based on various parameters, and we’ll be adding more as time goes on. We reveal some limits only when you reach them, and tell you about others in advance. Twitter applies limits to any person who reaches:

  • 1,000 total updates per day, on any and all devices
  • 250 total direct messages per day, on any and devices
  • 100 API requests per hour
  • Maximum number of follow attempts in a day

Follow limits are based on several things, one of which is our belief in a person’s good standing and intention. The behind-the-scenes portion of follow limiting varies by account, relationship, and changes over time. Based on current behavior in the Twitter community, we’ve concluded that this is both fair and reasonable. While we figure out what works best for everyone, the limits may change occasionally, but this is the nucleus and future limits will be based upon the success of these.

According to that it says that they are imposing a maximum follow attempts per day limit, which I’m fine with, facebook has the same limits, but I and others I’ve read about have been blocked completely from following others..which is completely unacceptable.

I’m not the only one apparently having frustrations:

Here are some comments on the twitter forums backing my claims:

Hi Crystal and Ev -

Thanks for posting on GSFN about this. I’m glad you’re putting limits in place to discourage spammers.

However, there are many of us who are using Twitter in a legitimate and respectful manner who are being blocked from following.
I didn’t receive any notification that I had reached any following limit. I got the “Something has gone wrong” message repeatedly until I surmised what was happening.

I’ll email Support to discuss this, but I wanted to point this out here since a discussion was already in place.

We have such a fun Pandora community going on via Twitter, I’d hate for it to be hampered. In terms of proving I’m not spammy, I’m happy to provide previously-twittered testimonials regarding how “useful” and/or “fun” my 2,000 twitter followers have found my twitterstream.

I’m very careful, as a Community Manager, about how I use Twitter. I hand-pick who to follow. My followed-following rate has always been close to 1-to-1. I only tweet a few times a day. I’ve repeatedly posted my personal email address in the stream, for conversations that require more than 140 characters.

Thanks very much for your attention, and for all your hard work!
I hope this gets sorted out soon. I’ve been enjoying the community of Pandora-lovers who have been bonding via your service.

Sincerely,
Lucia Willow
Pandora Community Manage

Comment 1:
Nice way of putting it. But I’m really much more frustrated than this at this point. I’ve been a HUGE advocate of Twitter despite many issues. I spent my time blocking and advocating the blocking of those ‘gaming’ the system. In return, I’ve always respected Twitter boundaries and have a 1-to-1 following ratio - but now I’ve got 50 people who have followed me in the past few days that I can’t follow back. This is very annoying - given that I gave an Unconference Panel on it at BlogHer on Sunday that lasted 2 1/2 hrs and got many of these users to sign up. If I can’t follow back the people that are following me - twitter becomes useless for me. – GeekMommy, 16 days ago (Delete or Edit for 15 minutes)

Comment 2:
I already have an issue with how you handle it: You post your e-mail so people can have private conversations, or do you post your e-mail for conversations that SHOULD be public, i.e. handled in a public place like for example get satisfaction? If they should be public, you should direct users to make threads on GSFN so more than just you and the other person can participate. – Thomas, 16 days ago

Here’s a thread by StopTwitterSpam on the issue:

#

stopthespam replied 12 days ago
Twitter - you guys have said many times that you will be continually reviewing your approach to fighting spam and refining yout tactics over time. I’ve been tracking the new follower limits very closely and I can’t imagine that you guys were targeting @pandora_radio, @comcastcares, and dozens of other legitimate businesses and individuals with these limits. And telling them to just wait a few days to add new followers is asking for a tremendous amount of patience from some of your most loyal users. Please tell us that you guys are looking closely at whatever algorithm is behind the follower limits to insure that only the *real* bad guys (like the6figureteam.com spammers) are being flagged, not the good guys.

# Comment_1
I totally agree. While Twitter isn’t *just* blocking/targeting comcastcares, pandora_radio, etc, the limits are for everyone and not just flagged users. They should update their system so that only the actual spammers get caught, as you said. – Chris Thomson, 12 days ago (Delete or Edit for 15 minutes)
# Comment_2
Very well said - and much more rationally than I could’ve put it. Thanks. I completely agree with this and hope they respond to you. – GeekMommy, 12 days ago (Delete or Edit for 15 minutes)
# Comment_3
How about watching to see which accounts are getting the most “blocked” votes and limit their following ability? Anytime I find a spammer, etc following me, I block them. Track that, and let people who have large accounts like Geek Mommy, Scoble, etc do what they do.

You can follow the rest of that thread here: What if I hit a Twitter Limit; and if you look it over you’ll see I’m not the only one with a lot of angst, apparently many of the top twitterers are frustrated at this.

Related articles

Popularity: 34% [?]Rate this: 3.2

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Tags: bebo, conversations, flickr, follower, pownce, relationships, Social Networks, spam measures, spam rules, spammer, stumbleupon, Twitter

Related posts

Moopz.com hushes friendfeed’s jabbering mouth - About time! (0)
Is 2008 the year of the Lifestream? (2)
Project Facebook: 5000+ Friends by end of April. [...]

Popularity: 34% [?]

26 Comments
Twitter

11Jul Moopz.com hushes friendfeed’s jabbering mouth - About time!

FriendFeed's homepageImage via Wikipedia

Friendfeed driving you nuts!?

Friendfeed is interesting, I’ve logged in a bit - but I find that it’s extremely hard to keep up with everything going on.

Yes it’s nice to have all this info in one place, after all it is the information age, but sometimes it just bombards us and we can’t make heads or tails.

Enter Moopz. Moops aggregates friendfeed conversations and groups them into relevant categories, it then features conversations which include links to the same “interesting story”.

Basically Moopz claims to weed out pointless banter that doesn’t link to anything exciting. On top of that Moopz tries to pull only the best information possible from each story to give readers a preview, so they can decide for themselves if they want to read more, or move on to the next.

Each story is tagged with related keywords, so you can search for stories quickly and efficiently by tag cloud or keyword.

Finally, you can also browse the “popular” category, for the most active conversations in the past 24 hours.

Moopz may be the answer to ending the clutter on friendfeed, only time will tell.

Have you had experience with Moopz? Please share your stories, ideas, and thoughts on this social network tool.

Related articles:
Zemanta Pixie

Popularity: 21% [?]Rate this: 2.5

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!
Tags: aggregates, clutter, conversations, friendfeed, information age, interesting story, moopz, network tool, pointless banter, relevant categories, Social Networks, Twitter, wikipedia

Related posts

Why I’m leaving Twitter…Follow me on Plurk! (26)
Poll for Bloggers:How many of you face time management issues & how [...]

Popularity: 21% [?]

No Comments
Friendfeed, Social Media, Social Networks, Technology, Twitter
 



This blog contributes to the web with Nofollow Reciprocity.